What we found
The assessment of shared meaning comes from reading the answers. The numerical
comparisons below measure exact brand names, source pages, and answer length;
a formal semantic-similarity score would require a separate assessment.
Shared themes in the answers
These examples illustrate where the substance aligned. Question descriptions are shortened; the study data contains the exact wording and full answers.
Tool recommendations also had some common ground. For the agency-platform
question (P03), the latest website answer and both API answers named Profound,
Semrush, and Peec AI. Their first-mentioned tools and the rest of their lists
varied.
For the client-reporting question (P08), all three answers included Otterly and
Peec AI. The website answer opened with Semrush and Scrunch; both API answers
opened with Indexly and Profound. Similar overall advice can therefore sit
alongside differences that matter to an individual brand’s visibility.
Why details can vary
AI answers have natural run-to-run variation: the same question can lead to different wording, examples, and search choices. Our repeated API requests showed this directly, with the question and model held the same. This pattern is consistent with the randomness involved in AI generation and variation in live search. Collection dates add another influence. Over 77 days, available pages, product information, and search results can change. One question retained “2024” in its wording, while a September API answer explicitly discussed sources from 2025–2026. Keeping prompts’ time references current helps make comparisons clearer. The sample supports normal answer variation and collection timing as plausible contributors. Their relative contributions remain unmeasured, alongside the possible effects of different models and search settings.The numbers in context
Overlap is the names or pages shared by two answers as a percentage of all
distinct names or pages in either answer, averaged across comparisons. These
figures describe how often specific names and links recur. The examples above
show how shared advice can draw on different names and pages.
The brand count covers a fixed list of 44 tools. Several website answers gave
general advice without naming tools on that list, which lowers the overall
brand overlap. Pairs where both answers named none of the listed tools were
excluded from that average. The website repetitions were collected on separate
days; the API repetitions were collected in one session.